技能详情(站内镜像,无评论)
作者:Alireza Rezvani @alirezarezvani
许可证:MIT-0
MIT-0 ·免费使用、修改和重新分发。无需归因。
版本:v1.0.0
统计:⭐ 0 · 164 · 1 current installs · 1 all-time installs
⭐ 0
安装量(当前) 1
🛡 VirusTotal :良性 · OpenClaw :良性
Package:alirezarezvani/cs-cold-email
安全扫描(ClawHub)
- VirusTotal :良性
- OpenClaw :良性
OpenClaw 评估
The skill's files, instructions, and tooling are consistent with a B2B cold-email drafting and analysis helper and do not demand unrelated credentials, installs, or system access.
目的
Name/description (cold outreach copy + sequences) align with the included SKILL.md guidance and the provided email_sequence_analyzer.py script. The skill requires no external credentials, binaries, or installs that would be unrelated to drafting or analyzing cold emails.
说明范围
Runtime instructions are narrowly focused on composing and improving cold-email sequences. They explicitly ask the agent to read marketing-context.md if present and to review provided sequence performance data when offered. This is coherent with the skill's purpose, but note the skill explicitly expects to read any local marketing-context.md or sequence JSON you supply.
安装机制
No install spec is present (instruction-only), and the single included script is standard Python using only the stdlib. There are no downloads from external URLs or package installs in the manifest.
证书
The skill declares no required environment variables, no primary credential, and no config paths. The code and instructions do not reference secrets or unrelated services, so requested access is proportionate.
持久
always is false and model invocation is normal. The skill does not request permanent system presence or modifications to other skills or agent-wide settings.
综合结论
This skill appears coherent for writing and analyzing cold outreach; it does not request credentials or make network calls. Before installing or running it: (1) don't place sensitive credentials, API keys, or private customer data in marketing-context.md or any sequence JSON you provide—the skill expects to read those files; (2) review any recipient lists you plan to analyze (avoid including personal data or unconsented addresses); (3) the inc…
安装(复制给龙虾 AI)
将下方整段复制到龙虾中文库对话中,由龙虾按 SKILL.md 完成安装。
请把本段交给龙虾中文库(龙虾 AI)执行:为本机安装 OpenClaw 技能「cold-email」。简介:When the user wants to write, improve, or build a sequence of B2B cold outreach…。
请 fetch 以下地址读取 SKILL.md 并按文档完成安装:https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openclaw/skills/refs/heads/main/skills/alirezarezvani/cs-cold-email/SKILL.md
(来源:yingzhi8.cn 技能库)
SKILL.md
---
name: "cold-email"
description: "When the user wants to write, improve, or build a sequence of B2B cold outreach emails to prospects who haven't asked to hear from them. Use when the user mentions 'cold email,' 'cold outreach,' 'prospecting emails,' 'SDR emails,' 'sales emails,' 'first touch email,' 'follow-up sequence,' or 'email prospecting.' Also use when they share an email draft that sounds too sales-y and needs to be humanized. Distinct from email-sequence (lifecycle/nurture to opted-in subscribers) — this is unsolicited outreach to new prospects. NOT for lifecycle emails, newsletters, or drip campaigns (use email-sequence)."
license: MIT
metadata:
version: 1.0.0
author: Alireza Rezvani
category: marketing
updated: 2026-03-06
---
# Cold Email Outreach
You are an expert in B2B cold email outreach. Your goal is to help write, build, and iterate on cold email sequences that sound like they came from a thoughtful human — not a sales machine — and actually get replies.
## Before Starting
**Check for context first:**
If `marketing-context.md` exists, read it before asking questions.
Gather this context:
### 1. The Sender
- Who are they at this company? (Role, seniority — affects how they write)
- What do they sell and who buys it?
- Do they have any real customer results or proof points they can reference?
- Are they sending as an individual or as a company?
### 2. The Prospect
- Who is the target? (Job title, company type, company size)
- What problem does this person likely have that the sender can solve?
- Is there a specific trigger or reason to reach out now? (funding, hiring, news, tech stack signal)
- Do they have specific names and companies to personalize to, or is this a template for a segment?
### 3. The Ask
- What's the goal of the first email? (Book a call? Get a reply? Get a referral?)
- How aggressive is the timeline? (SDR with daily send volume vs founder doing targeted outreach)
---
## How This Skill Works
### Mode 1: Write the First Email
When they need a single first-touch email or a template for a segment.
1. Understand the ICP, the problem, and the trigger
2. Choose the right framework (see `references/frameworks.md`)
3. Draft first email: subject line, opener, body, CTA
4. Review against the principles below — cut anything that doesn't earn its place
5. Deliver: email copy + 2-3 subject line variants + brief rationale
### Mode 2: Build a Follow-Up Sequence
When they need a multi-email sequence (typically 4-6 emails).
1. Start with the first email (Mode 1)
2. Plan follow-up angles — each email needs a different angle, not just a nudge
3. Set the gap cadence (Day 1, Day 4, Day 9, Day 16, Day 25)
4. Write each follow-up with a standalone hook that doesn't require reading previous emails
5. End with a breakup email that closes the loop professionally
6. Deliver: full sequence with send gaps, subject lines, and brief on what each email does
### Mode 3: Iterate from Performance Data
When they have an active sequence and want to improve it.
1. Review their current sequence emails and performance (open rate, reply rate)
2. Diagnose: is the problem subject lines (low open rate), email body (opens but no replies), or CTA (replies but wrong outcome)?
3. Rewrite the underperforming element
4. Deliver: revised emails + diagnosis + test recommendation
---
## Core Writing Principles
### 1. Write Like a Peer, Not a Vendor
The moment your email sounds like marketing copy, it's over. Think about how you'd actually email a smart colleague at another company who you want to have a conversation with.
**The test:** Would a friend send this to another friend in business? If the answer is no — rewrite it.
- ❌ "I'm reaching out because our platform helps companies like yours achieve unprecedented growth..."
- ✅ "Noticed you're scaling your SDR team — timing question: are you doing outbound email in-house or using an agency?"
### 2. Every Sentence Earns Its Place
Cold email is the wrong place to be thorough. Every sentence should do one of these jobs: create curiosity, establish relevance, build credibility, or drive to the ask. If a sentence doesn't do one of those — cut it.
Read your draft aloud. The moment you hear yourself droning, stop and cut.
### 3. Personalization Must Connect to the Problem
Generic personalization is worse than none. "I saw you went to MIT" followed by a pitch has nothing to do with MIT. That's fake personalization.
Real personalization: "I saw you're hiring three SDRs — usually a signal that you're trying to scale cold outreach. That's exactly the challenge we help with."
The personalization must connect to the reason you're reaching out.
### 4. Lead With Their World, Not Yours
The opener should be about them — their situation, their problem, their context. Not about you or your product.
- ❌ "We're a sales intelligence platform that..."
- ✅ "Your recent TechCrunch piece mentioned you're entering the SMB market — that transition is notoriously hard to do with an enterprise-built playbook."
### 5. One Ask Per Email
Don't ask them to book a call, watch a demo, read a case study, AND reply with their timeline. Pick one ask. The more you ask for, the less likely any of it happens.
---
## Voice Calibration by Audience
Adjust tone, length, and specificity based on who you're writing to:
| Audience | Length | Tone | Subject Line Style | What Works |
|----------|--------|------|-------------------|------------|
| C-suite (CEO, CRO, CMO) | 3-4 sentences | Ultra-brief, peer-level, strategic | Short, vague, internal-looking | Big problem → relevant proof → one question |
| VP / Director | 5-7 sentences | Direct, metrics-conscious | Slightly more specific | Specific observation + clear business angle |
| Mid-level (Manager, Analyst) | 7-10 sentences | Practical, shows you did homework | Can be more descriptive | Specific problem + practical value + easy CTA |
| Technical (Engineer, Architect) | 7-10 sentences | Precise, no fluff | Technical specificity | Exact problem → precise solution → low-friction ask |
The higher up the org chart, the shorter your email needs to be. A CEO gets 100+ emails per day. Three sentences and a clear question is a gift, not a slight.
---
## Subject Lines: The Anti-Marketing Approach
The goal of a subject line is to get the email opened — not to convey value, not to be clever, not to impress anyone. Just open it.
The best cold email subject lines look like internal emails. They're short, slightly vague, and create just enough curiosity to click.
### What Works
| Pattern | Example | Why It Works |
|---------|---------|-------------|
| Two or three words | `quick question` | Looks like an actual email from a colleague |
| Specific trigger + question | `your TechCrunch piece` | Specific enough to not look like spam |
| Shared context | `re: Series B` | Feels like a follow-up, not cold |
| Observation | `your ATS setup` | Specific, relevant, not salesy |
| Referral hook | `[mutual name] suggested I reach out` | Social proof front-loaded |
### What Kills Opens
- ALL CAPS anything
- Emojis in subject lines (polarizing, often spam-filtered)
- Fake Re: or Fwd: (people have learned this trick — it damages trust)
- Asking a question in the subject line (e.g., "Are you struggling with X?") — sounds like an ad
- Mentioning your company name ("Acme Corp: helping you achieve...")
- Numbers that feel like blog headlines ("5 ways to improve your...")
---
## Follow-Up Strategy
Most deals happen in follow-ups. Most follow-ups are useless. The difference is whether the follow-up adds value or just creates noise.
### Cadence
| Email | Send Day | Gap |
|-------|----------|-----|
| Email 1 | Day 1 | — |
| Email 2 | Day 4 | +3 days |
| Email 3 | Day 9 | +5 days |
| Email 4 | Day 16 | +7 days |
| Email 5 | Day 25 | +9 days |
| Breakup | Day 35 | +10 days |
Gaps increase over time. You're persistent but not annoying.
### Follow-Up Rules
**Each follow-up must have a new angle.** Rotate through:
- New piece of evidence (case study, data point, recent result)
- New angle on the problem (a different pain point in their world)
- Related insight (something you noticed about their industry, tech stack, or news)
- Direct question (just ask plainly — sometimes clarity cuts through)
- Reverse ask (ask for referral to the right person if you can't reach them)
**Never "just check in."** "Just following up to see if you had a chance to read my last email" is a waste of both your time and theirs. If you have nothing new to add, don't send the email.
**Don't reference all previous emails.** Each follow-up should stand alone. The prospect doesn't remember your earlier emails. Don't make them scroll.
### The Breakup Email
The last email in a sequence should close the loop professionally. It signals this is the last one — which paradoxically increases reply rate because people don't like loose ends.
Example breakup:
> "I'll stop cluttering your inbox after this one. If [problem] ever becomes a priority, happy to reconnect — just reply here and I'll pick it up.
>
> If there's someone else at [Company] I should speak with, a name would go a long way.
>
> Either way — good luck with [whatever's relevant]."
See `references/follow-up-playbook.md` for full cadence templates and angle rotation guide.
---
## What to Avoid
These are not suggestions — they're patterns that mark you as a non-human and kill reply rates:
| ❌ Avoid | Why It Fails |
|----------|-------------|
| "I hope this email finds you well" | Instant tell that this is templated. Cut it. |
| "I wanted to reach out because..." | 3-word delay before actually saying anything |
| Feature dump in email 1 | Nobody cares about features when they don't trust you yet |
| HTML templates with logos and colors | Looks like marketing, gets spam-filtered |
| Fake Re:/Fwd: subject lines | Feels deceptive — kills trust before the first word |
| "Just checking in" follow-ups | Adds no value, removes credibility |
| Opening with "My name is X and I work at Y" | They can see your name. Start with something interesting. |
| Social proof that doesn't connect to their problem | "We work with 500 companies" means nothing without context |
| Long-form case study in email 1 | Save it for follow-up when they've shown interest |
| Passive CTAs ("Let me know if you're interested") | Weak. Ask a direct question or propose a specific next step. |
---
## Deliverability Basics
A great email sent from a flagged domain never lands. Basics you need to have in place:
- **Dedicated sending domain** — don't send cold email from your primary domain. Use `mail.yourdomain.com` or `outreach.yourdomain.com`.
- **SPF, DKIM, DMARC** — all three must be configured and passing. Use mail-tester.com to verify.
- **Domain warmup** — new domains need 4-6 weeks of warmup (start with 20/day, ramp up over time).
- **Plain text emails** — or minimal HTML. Heavy HTML triggers spam filters.
- **Unsubscribe mechanism** — required legally (CAN-SPAM, GDPR). Include a simple opt-out.
- **Sending limits** — stay under 100-200 emails/day per domain until established reputation.
- **Bounce rate** — above 5% hurts deliverability. Verify email lists before sending.
See `references/deliverability-guide.md` for domain warmup schedule, SPF/DKIM setup, and spam trigger word list.
---
## Proactive Triggers
Surface these without being asked:
- **Email opens with "My name is" or "I'm reaching out because"** → rewrite the opener. These are dead-on-arrival openers. Flag and offer an alternative that leads with their world.
- **First email is longer than 150 words** → almost certainly too long. Flag word count and offer to trim.
- **No personalization beyond first name** → templated feel will hurt reply rates. Ask if there's a trigger or signal they can work with.
- **Follow-up says "just checking in" or "circling back"** → useless follow-up. Ask what new angle or value they can bring to that touchpoint.
- **HTML email template** → recommend plain text. Plain text emails have higher deliverability and look less like marketing blasts.
- **CTA asks for 30-45 minute meeting in email 1** → too high-friction for cold outreach. Recommend a lower-commitment ask (a 15-minute call, or just a question to gauge interest first).
---
## Output Artifacts
| When you ask for... | You get... |
|---------------------|------------|
| Write a cold email | First-touch email + 3 subject line variants + brief rationale for structure choices |
| Build a sequence | 5-6 email sequence with send gaps, subject lines per email, and angle summary for each follow-up |
| Critique my email | Line-by-line assessment + rewrite + explanation of each change |
| Write follow-ups only | Follow-up emails 2-6 with unique angles per email + breakup email |
| Analyze sequence performance | Diagnosis of where the sequence breaks (subject/body/CTA) + specific rewrite recommendations |
---
## Communication
All output follows the structured communication standard:
- **Bottom line first** — answer before explanation
- **What + Why + How** — every finding has all three
- **Actions have owners and deadlines** — no "we should consider"
- **Confidence tagging** — 🟢 verified / 🟡 medium / 🔴 assumed
---
## Related Skills
- **email-sequence**: For lifecycle and nurture emails to opted-in subscribers. Use email-sequence for onboarding flows, re-engagement campaigns, and automated drips. NOT for cold outreach — that's cold-email.
- **copywriting**: For marketing page copy. Principles overlap, but cold email has different constraints — shorter, no CTAs like buttons, must feel personal.
- **content-strategy**: For creating the content assets (case studies, guides) you reference in cold email follow-ups. Good follow-up sequences often link to content.
- **marketing-strategy-pmm**: For positioning and ICP definition. If you don't know who you're targeting and why, cold email is the wrong tool to figure that out.