技能详情（站内镜像，无评论）
许可证：MIT-0
MIT-0 ·免费使用、修改和重新分发。无需归因。
版本：v1.0.0
统计：⭐ 0 · 584 · 0 current installs · 0 all-time installs
⭐ 0
安装量（当前） 0
🛡 VirusTotal ：良性 · OpenClaw ：良性
Package：1kalin/afrexai-vendor-eval
安全扫描（ClawHub）
- VirusTotal ：良性
- OpenClaw ：良性
OpenClaw 评估
An instruction-only vendor evaluation framework that tells the agent to research public web sources and produce a scored due-diligence report; it requests no credentials, installs nothing, and is internally consistent with its stated purpose.
目的
The name/README and SKILL.md all describe a vendor due-diligence framework; the required surface is minimal (no env vars, no binaries, no installs) which is appropriate for a research/reporting skill.
说明范围
Instructions direct the agent to perform web searches (reviews, funding/layoffs, SOC2, API docs, contract/SLA) and to 'dig' for bad news. This is appropriate for vendor research but is open-ended — the agent may perform extensive web queries and should be required to cite sources and avoid accessing private/internal systems or credentials.
安装机制
No install spec and no code files; nothing will be written to disk or installed by the skill itself.
证书
The skill requires no environment variables, credentials, or config paths, which is proportional for a public-web research/reporting tool.
持久
always is false and the skill does not request persistent privileges or modify other skills. The default autonomous invocation is allowed but not excessive given the skill's nature.
综合结论
This skill is coherent and low-risk in terms of credentials or installs, but it performs open-ended web research. Before enabling: (1) require the agent to include full source links and verbatim evidence for any critical claim, (2) instruct it not to access or request any private credentials or internal systems, (3) have legal/infosec review any contractual/SLA excerpts before relying on them, and (4) if you want to limit autonomous web access…
安装（复制给龙虾 AI）
将下方整段复制到龙虾中文库对话中，由龙虾按 SKILL.md 完成安装。
请把本段交给龙虾中文库（龙虾 AI）执行：为本机安装 OpenClaw 技能「Vendor Evaluation & Due Diligence」。简介：Conducts a comprehensive, weighted assessment of software vendors and partners …。
请 fetch 以下地址读取 SKILL.md 并按文档完成安装：https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openclaw/skills/refs/heads/main/skills/1kalin/afrexai-vendor-eval/SKILL.md
（来源：yingzhi8.cn 技能库）SKILL.md
# Vendor Evaluation & Due Diligence
Structured framework for evaluating software vendors, service providers, and technology partners before signing contracts.
## What This Does
Runs a systematic vendor assessment across 8 dimensions:
1. **Financial Stability** — Revenue signals, funding, burn rate indicators
2. **Technical Fit** — Architecture compatibility, integration complexity, API quality
3. **Security & Compliance** — SOC2, ISO27001, GDPR, data residency
4. **Pricing Analysis** — TCO modeling, hidden costs, contract traps
5. **Reference Check** — Customer sentiment, G2/Capterra scores, churn signals
6. **Support Quality** — SLA terms, response times, escalation paths
7. **Vendor Lock-in Risk** — Data portability, switching costs, proprietary dependencies
8. **Roadmap Alignment** — Product direction vs. your needs over 12-36 months
## How to Use
Tell your agent:
- "Evaluate [vendor] for [use case]"
- "Compare [vendor A] vs [vendor B] for our [need]"
- "Run due diligence on [company] before we sign"
The agent will research the vendor using web search and produce a scored evaluation report with a GO / CAUTION / NO-GO recommendation.
## Scoring
Each dimension scores 1-10. Overall score is weighted:
- Technical Fit & Security: 2x weight
- Pricing & Lock-in: 1.5x weight
- All others: 1x weight
**Thresholds:**
- 75+ = GO (proceed with negotiation)
- 50-74 = CAUTION (address gaps before committing)
- Below 50 = NO-GO (find alternatives)
## Output Format
```
## Vendor Evaluation: [Name]
**Use Case:** [What you're buying]
**Date:** [Assessment date]
**Overall Score:** [X/100] — [GO/CAUTION/NO-GO]
### Dimension Scores
| Dimension | Score | Key Finding |
|-----------|-------|-------------|
| Financial Stability | X/10 | ... |
| Technical Fit | X/10 | ... |
| ... | ... | ... |
### Critical Risks
- [List dealbreakers or major concerns]
### Negotiation Leverage
- [Points to push on in contract talks]
### Recommendation
[Final verdict with reasoning]
```
## Instructions for Agent
When asked to evaluate a vendor:
1. Search the web for: "[vendor] reviews", "[vendor] pricing", "[vendor] SOC2", "[vendor] alternatives", "[vendor] G2 reviews"
2. Check for recent funding/layoff news
3. Look at their API documentation quality
4. Find contract terms and SLA information
5. Score each dimension with evidence
6. Produce the evaluation report
7. Flag any dealbreakers prominently
Be direct. Companies hide bad news — dig for it. A vendor that looks perfect probably isn't. Find the tradeoffs.
For comparative evaluations, use the same framework side-by-side with a clear winner per dimension.