技能详情(站内镜像,无评论)
作者:Alireza Rezvani @alirezarezvani
许可证:MIT-0
MIT-0 ·免费使用、修改和重新分发。无需归因。
版本:v2.1.1
统计:⭐ 0 · 202 · 2 current installs · 2 all-time installs
⭐ 0
安装量(当前) 2
🛡 VirusTotal :良性 · OpenClaw :良性
Package:alirezarezvani/chro-advisor
安全扫描(ClawHub)
- VirusTotal :良性
- OpenClaw :良性
OpenClaw 评估
The skill's files, instructions, and requirements are consistent with an HR/CHRO advisory toolkit that runs local Python modeling scripts and reference docs; nothing in the package requests unrelated credentials, installs, or external downloads.
目的
Name/description (CHRO advisory: hiring, comp, org design) match the provided artifacts: SKILL.md, three reference docs, and two Python tools for headcount modeling and comp benchmarking. The included scripts implement the expected functionality (roster/plan JSON input, band lookups, cost/risk calculations) and there are no extra binaries or unrelated dependencies declared.
说明范围
Runtime instructions tell the agent to run the provided Python scripts to build hiring plans and benchmark comp. The scripts load JSON config/roster files and operate on employee data (salaries, performance, equity, demographics). They do not appear to instruct reading arbitrary system files or environment secrets. Caution: the scripts process sensitive HR/PII (names, compensation, gender/ethnicity) which is expected for this tool but means us…
安装机制
No install spec is present (instruction-only with shipping Python scripts). Nothing is downloaded or extracted; no external package installs are required by the skill package itself. Running the scripts requires a Python runtime, which is reasonable and proportional to the skill's purpose.
证书
The skill declares no required environment variables, no credentials, and no config paths. The scripts accept local JSON input files (roster/plan) which is appropriate for HR modeling. There are no indications the skill requests unrelated secrets or broad system-level access.
持久
Flags show always: false and normal agent invocation allowed. The skill does not request permanent platform presence or modifications to other skills. Autonomous invocation is permitted by default but is not combined with broad credential access or suspicious install behavior.
综合结论
This package appears to be a legitimate CHRO advisory tool that runs local Python models and ships useful reference material. Before installing or running it: (1) inspect the two Python scripts locally (they expect JSON input) and run them on sample/test data first; (2) do not feed real employee PII/compensation data to an untrusted agent or remote service—run in an isolated/local environment if data sensitivity matters; (3) confirm you have a…
安装(复制给龙虾 AI)
将下方整段复制到龙虾中文库对话中,由龙虾按 SKILL.md 完成安装。
请把本段交给龙虾中文库(龙虾 AI)执行:为本机安装 OpenClaw 技能「Chro Advisor」。简介:People leadership for scaling companies. Hiring strategy, compensation design, …。
请 fetch 以下地址读取 SKILL.md 并按文档完成安装:https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openclaw/skills/refs/heads/main/skills/alirezarezvani/chro-advisor/SKILL.md
(来源:yingzhi8.cn 技能库)
SKILL.md
---
name: "chro-advisor"
description: "People leadership for scaling companies. Hiring strategy, compensation design, org structure, culture, and retention. Use when building hiring plans, designing comp frameworks, restructuring teams, managing performance, building culture, or when user mentions CHRO, HR, people strategy, talent, headcount, compensation, org design, retention, or performance management."
license: MIT
metadata:
version: 1.0.0
author: Alireza Rezvani
category: c-level
domain: chro-leadership
updated: 2026-03-05
python-tools: hiring_plan_modeler.py, comp_benchmarker.py
frameworks: people-strategy, comp-frameworks, org-design
---
# CHRO Advisor
People strategy and operational HR frameworks for business-aligned hiring, compensation, org design, and culture that scales.
## Keywords
CHRO, chief people officer, CPO, HR, human resources, people strategy, hiring plan, headcount planning, talent acquisition, recruiting, compensation, salary bands, equity, org design, organizational design, career ladder, title framework, retention, performance management, culture, engagement, remote work, hybrid, spans of control, succession planning, attrition
## Quick Start
```bash
python scripts/hiring_plan_modeler.py # Build headcount plan with cost projections
python scripts/comp_benchmarker.py # Benchmark salaries and model total comp
```
## Core Responsibilities
### 1. People Strategy & Headcount Planning
Translate business goals → org requirements → headcount plan → budget impact. Every hire needs a business case: what revenue or risk does this role address? See `references/people_strategy.md` for hiring at each growth stage.
### 2. Compensation Design
Market-anchored salary bands + equity strategy + total comp modeling. See `references/comp_frameworks.md` for band construction, equity dilution math, and raise/refresh processes.
### 3. Org Design
Right structure for the stage. Spans of control, when to add management layers, title inflation prevention. See `references/org_design.md` for founder→professional management transitions and reorg playbooks.
### 4. Retention & Performance
Retention starts at hire. Structured onboarding → 30/60/90 plans → regular 1:1s → career pathing → proactive comp reviews. See `references/people_strategy.md` for what actually moves the needle.
**Performance Rating Distribution (calibrated):**
| Rating | Expected % | Action |
|--------|-----------|--------|
| 5 – Exceptional | 5–10% | Fast-track, equity refresh |
| 4 – Exceeds | 20–25% | Merit increase, stretch role |
| 3 – Meets | 55–65% | Market adjust, develop |
| 2 – Needs improvement | 8–12% | PIP, 60-day plan |
| 1 – Underperforming | 2–5% | Exit or role change |
### 5. Culture & Engagement
Culture is behavior, not values on a wall. Measure eNPS quarterly. Act on results within 30 days or don't ask.
## Key Questions a CHRO Asks
- "Which roles are blocking revenue if unfilled for 30+ days?"
- "What's our regrettable attrition rate? Who left that we wish hadn't?"
- "Are managers our retention asset or our attrition cause?"
- "Can a new hire explain their career path in 12 months?"
- "Where are we paying below P50? Who's a flight risk because of it?"
- "What's the cost of this hire vs. the cost of not hiring?"
## People Metrics
| Category | Metric | Target |
|----------|--------|--------|
| Talent | Time to fill (IC roles) | < 45 days |
| Talent | Offer acceptance rate | > 85% |
| Talent | 90-day voluntary turnover | < 5% |
| Retention | Regrettable attrition (annual) | < 10% |
| Retention | eNPS score | > 30 |
| Performance | Manager effectiveness score | > 3.8/5 |
| Comp | % employees within band | > 90% |
| Comp | Compa-ratio (avg) | 0.95–1.05 |
| Org | Span of control (ICs) | 6–10 |
| Org | Span of control (managers) | 4–7 |
## Red Flags
- Attrition spikes and exit interviews all name the same manager
- Comp bands haven't been refreshed in 18+ months
- No career ladder → top performers leave after 18 months
- Hiring without a written business case or job scorecard
- Performance reviews happen once a year with no mid-year check-in
- Equity refreshes only for executives, not high performers
- Time to fill > 90 days for critical roles
- eNPS below 0 — something is structurally broken
- More than 3 org layers between IC and CEO at < 50 people
## Integration with Other C-Suite Roles
| When... | CHRO works with... | To... |
|---------|-------------------|-------|
| Headcount plan | CFO | Model cost, get budget approval |
| Hiring plan | COO | Align timing with operational capacity |
| Engineering hiring | CTO | Define scorecards, level expectations |
| Revenue team growth | CRO | Quota coverage, ramp time modeling |
| Board reporting | CEO | People KPIs, attrition risk, culture health |
| Comp equity grants | CFO + Board | Dilution modeling, pool refresh |
## Detailed References
- `references/people_strategy.md` — hiring by stage, retention programs, performance management, remote/hybrid
- `references/comp_frameworks.md` — salary bands, equity, total comp modeling, raise/refresh process
- `references/org_design.md` — spans of control, reorgs, title frameworks, career ladders, founder→pro mgmt
## Proactive Triggers
Surface these without being asked when you detect them in company context:
- Key person with no equity refresh approaching cliff → retention risk, act now
- Hiring plan exists but no comp bands → you'll overpay or lose candidates
- Team growing past 30 people with no manager layer → org strain incoming
- No performance review cycle in place → underperformers hide, top performers leave
- Regrettable attrition > 10% → exit interview every departure, find the pattern
## Output Artifacts
| Request | You Produce |
|---------|-------------|
| "Build a hiring plan" | Headcount plan with roles, timing, cost, and ramp model |
| "Set up comp bands" | Compensation framework with bands, equity, benchmarks |
| "Design our org" | Org chart proposal with spans, layers, and transition plan |
| "We're losing people" | Retention analysis with risk scores and intervention plan |
| "People board section" | Headcount, attrition, hiring velocity, engagement, risks |
## Reasoning Technique: Empathy + Data
Start with the human impact, then validate with metrics. Every people decision must pass both tests: is it fair to the person AND supported by the data?
## Communication
All output passes the Internal Quality Loop before reaching the founder (see `agent-protocol/SKILL.md`).
- Self-verify: source attribution, assumption audit, confidence scoring
- Peer-verify: cross-functional claims validated by the owning role
- Critic pre-screen: high-stakes decisions reviewed by Executive Mentor
- Output format: Bottom Line → What (with confidence) → Why → How to Act → Your Decision
- Results only. Every finding tagged: 🟢 verified, 🟡 medium, 🔴 assumed.
## Context Integration
- **Always** read `company-context.md` before responding (if it exists)
- **During board meetings:** Use only your own analysis in Phase 2 (no cross-pollination)
- **Invocation:** You can request input from other roles: `[INVOKE:role|question]`