技能详情（站内镜像，无评论）
许可证：MIT-0
MIT-0 ·免费使用、修改和重新分发。无需归因。
版本：v1.0.0
统计：⭐ 1 · 477 · 8 current installs · 9 all-time installs
⭐ 1
安装量（当前） 9
🛡 VirusTotal ：良性 · OpenClaw ：良性
Package：1kalin/contract-reviewer
安全扫描（ClawHub）
- VirusTotal ：良性
- OpenClaw ：良性
OpenClaw 评估
The skill's instructions, requirements, and scope are internally consistent with a contract-review assistant and do not request unrelated credentials or installs.
目的
Name, description, and the SKILL.md all describe analyzing contracts and producing structured risk reports. The skill requests no binaries, env vars, or installs — appropriate for an instruction-only contract reviewer.
说明范围
Instructions ask the user to provide contract text by paste, file, or URL and then analyze it against a clear checklist. The model is not instructed to read arbitrary system files or environment variables. One minor note: accepting a URL implies the agent may fetch remote content; the SKILL.md doesn't specify how to handle remote fetching or verify trust. Recommend clarifying that remote URLs should only be fetched with user consent and that s…
安装机制
No install specification or code files are present; this is instruction-only, which minimizes risk from installation actions.
证书
The skill requires no environment variables, credentials, or config paths. There are no unrelated or excessive secret requests that would be disproportionate to the stated legal-review purpose.
持久
The skill is not marked always:true and does not request persistent system-level privileges. Default autonomous invocation is allowed (platform normal), but there is no indication the skill attempts to modify other skills or system settings.
综合结论
This skill appears internally consistent for doing AI-assisted contract reviews, but it is not a substitute for legal advice. Before using: (1) avoid pasting unredacted sensitive or confidential data — contracts can contain PII and trade secrets; redact or test with non-sensitive samples first, (2) clarify how the agent will handle URLs (will it fetch remote files?) and only allow fetching trusted endpoints, (3) verify the skill publisher (sou…
安装（复制给龙虾 AI）
将下方整段复制到龙虾中文库对话中，由龙虾按 SKILL.md 完成安装。
请把本段交给龙虾中文库（龙虾 AI）执行：为本机安装 OpenClaw 技能「Contract Reviewer」。简介：Review business contracts for risks, missing clauses, unfavorable terms, and co…。
请 fetch 以下地址读取 SKILL.md 并按文档完成安装：https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openclaw/skills/refs/heads/main/skills/1kalin/contract-reviewer/SKILL.md
（来源：yingzhi8.cn 技能库）SKILL.md
---
name: contract-reviewer
description: >
Review business contracts for risks, missing clauses, unfavorable terms, and compliance gaps.
Use when analyzing NDAs, MSAs, SaaS agreements, vendor contracts, SOWs, or employment agreements.
Generates a structured risk report with recommendations. Built by AfrexAI.
metadata:
version: 1.0.0
author: AfrexAI
tags: [legal, contracts, risk, compliance, business]
---
# Contract Reviewer
Review any business contract for risks, gaps, and unfavorable terms. Outputs a structured risk report.
## When to Use
- Reviewing NDAs, MSAs, SaaS agreements, vendor contracts, SOWs
- Pre-signature risk assessment
- Comparing contract terms against industry standards
- Identifying missing protective clauses
- Compliance gap analysis (GDPR, SOC 2, HIPAA references)
## How to Use
1. User provides contract text (paste, file, or URL)
2. Agent analyzes against the framework below
3. Outputs structured risk report
## Analysis Framework
### 1. Contract Metadata
Extract and confirm:
- **Parties**: Who is bound? Are entities correctly named?
- **Effective date & term**: Start, duration, auto-renewal?
- **Governing law & jurisdiction**: Which state/country?
- **Contract type**: NDA / MSA / SaaS / SOW / Employment / Vendor / Other
### 2. Financial Terms Review
Flag issues with:
- **Payment terms**: Net 30/60/90? Late payment penalties?
- **Price escalation**: Annual increases capped? CPI-linked?
- **Hidden fees**: Setup, overage, early termination, minimum commitments
- **Currency & tax**: Who bears tax obligations?
### 3. Risk Clauses (RED FLAGS)
Score each 🔴 High / 🟡 Medium / 🟢 Low:
| Clause | What to Check |
|--------|--------------|
| **Limitation of liability** | Is it capped? Mutual? Carve-outs for IP/data? |
| **Indemnification** | One-sided or mutual? Uncapped exposure? |
| **Termination** | Can either party terminate for convenience? Notice period? |
| **Auto-renewal** | Silent renewal? Opt-out window too short? |
| **IP ownership** | Who owns work product? License-back provisions? |
| **Data handling** | DPA included? Breach notification timeline? Data return/deletion? |
| **Non-compete / non-solicit** | Scope, duration, geography reasonable? |
| **Force majeure** | Included? Pandemic/cyber covered? |
| **Assignment** | Can they assign without consent? Change of control? |
| **Warranty disclaimers** | "As-is" without recourse? SLA commitments? |
| **Confidentiality** | Mutual? Duration? Carve-outs? Survival period? |
| **Dispute resolution** | Arbitration vs litigation? Venue favorable? |
### 4. Missing Clauses Check
Flag if absent:
- [ ] Data Processing Agreement (if personal data involved)
- [ ] SLA with uptime commitments and credits
- [ ] Insurance requirements
- [ ] Audit rights
- [ ] Subcontractor approval rights
- [ ] Escrow provisions (for critical software)
- [ ] Business continuity / disaster recovery obligations
- [ ] Right to terminate for cause (material breach + cure period)
### 5. Plain Language Issues
- Ambiguous terms ("reasonable efforts" without definition)
- Undefined capitalized terms
- Conflicting clauses (e.g., termination vs auto-renewal)
- Missing exhibits or schedules referenced but not attached
## Output Format
```markdown
# Contract Review Report
## Summary
- **Contract**: [type] between [Party A] and [Party B]
- **Overall Risk Level**: 🔴/🟡/🟢
- **Top 3 Concerns**: [bullet list]
- **Recommendation**: Sign / Negotiate / Walk Away
## Detailed Findings
### 🔴 High Risk
[numbered list with clause reference, issue, recommendation]
### 🟡 Medium Risk
[numbered list with clause reference, issue, recommendation]
### 🟢 Low Risk / Acceptable
[numbered list noting well-drafted provisions]
## Missing Clauses
[checklist of what should be added]
## Suggested Redlines
[specific language changes recommended, with before/after]
## Next Steps
1. [prioritized action items]
```
## Important Notes
- This is an **AI-assisted review**, not legal advice
- Always have a qualified attorney review before signing
- Flag jurisdiction-specific requirements the model may miss
- For regulated industries (healthcare, finance), additional compliance review needed
## AfrexAI
Built by [AfrexAI](https://afrexai-cto.github.io/aaas/landing.html) — AI agents for business operations.
Need a full-time AI legal operations agent? We deploy managed AI agents starting at $1,500/month.